When plotting the perfect crime, probably involving some sort of electronic funds transfer, it's probably important to think beyond the successful completion. How could I keep that genius to myself? The urge to tell just one person would be overwhelming. But who?
Albert would compound my guilt by convincing me there was no such thing as a victimless crime.
Iris would blackmail me.
Monk, well, she could certainly keep it on the DL. But I feel strongly that one should not be a burden to their children
Kate and Tina both pop Ambien before bed AND keep a phone on their nightstands.
Although she would change names, Sweet's "fiction" piece about the events would have some previously undisclosed-to-the-public detail that would end up with her interrogation. And, poor girl, she is a terrible liar.
Ruby would have already dug the grave/split the money with me.
Daisy would no longer make direct eye contact with me.
Mary's sense of civic duty is so skewed she would flat out turn me in.
Diane would tell Widder. Who would tell Sanger. Who would tell. . .
Tracy's health would be impaired by the stress of it all.
Jamie would give me up in exchange for a lighter sentence on whatever charges du jour she was facing.
Serena would type the story up and send it to thirty people who would suffer thirty years of bad luck if they didn't forward it to thirty people within thirty minutes.
Unbelievably, Emily would be a good choice. Absolutely no one would believe her even if if she did manage to accurately recount a third of the story.
Road Trip with Sparticle Ebay Item number: 6610238098
Recent Comments